misfitS pOLITICS

We talk. We write. We entertain. Or so we think.
  • Home
  • Misfit Migrants
  • Mess Hall
  • Meet The Misfits
  • Misc. Musings
  • Home
  • Misfit Migrants
  • Mess Hall
  • Meet The Misfits
  • Misc. Musings

Mother Land

7/25/2017

0 Comments

 
Alexandra F. Baldwin
As Charlie Gard enters the last stages of his tragic life, debate over his (lack of) care continues in the UK and abroad. In the US, that debate has been driven by a multitude of agendas, from those who blame socialized medicine to those who praise socialized medicine for caring for him this far, to those who see this as a right-to-life issue more than anything else.

I don’t wholly agree with any of those, although they are not all that far off. I can’t rightly credit the public health system for “keeping him alive this long” if that same system is refusing a medically viable chance to treat him further (and, before the armchair doctors start in on the child’s prognosis: the doctor offering further treatment isn’t some quack snake-oil salesman, he is a professor of neurology at Columbia University Medical Center). And while the attitudes of the “quality of life” crowd sound pretty familiar, I don’t think that this is strictly a right to life issue: Charlie’s parents should have every right to eschew low-hope treatments if they think that Charlie’s fight is over now.

More than anything, this is about the right of an individual and family to self-determination. Socialized medicine isn’t the cause of this tragedy; it is just another symptom of the root problem: a willingness to abdicate frightening power to the state under the historically debunked theory that the state knows what’s best for its citizens. Charlie Gard’s parents sought to do something – seek the best care for their child – that is so fundamentally natural that most Americans would never even stop to think that it required any sort of permission.

At a very basic level, law in the UK has now evolved to the unmistakable conclusion that children are, first and foremost, the property of the state. Parents are given quite a bit of leeway in how they foster and raise those state assets, but when the rubber meets the road, the state is the ultimate owner of every child. Under British law, un-elected and unaccountable bureaucrats are the ultimate arbiters of what is in every child’s best interest.

There is a whole spate of potential iterations of this line of thinking, and none of them are anything less than terrifying. As the state is the official arbiter of which lives are worth living and not worth living, it stands to reason that the state also holds the power to order a pregnancy terminated if the Council of Wise Doctor Folk determine that the fetus has some sort of affliction that would make the life not worth living. And, of course, they decide what is and isn’t worth living. There are already countries where babies with Down syndrome are near-universally aborted, and the British government has just ventured into territory where, with just the tiniest extension of existing law, having a baby with Down syndrome could be deemed illegal.

{I’m old enough to remember when my right to have an abortion was based on an implied Constitutional right to privacy between my doctor and me. In the UK, that now includes me, my doctor and the entire 1.4 million employees of the National Health Service.}

Clearly, NHS’s right to block treatment of a patient under “quality of life” criteria extends to more than just the rare mitochondrial DNA disease that Charlie Gard has. What would we make of a healthy adult paralyzed in some kind of accident? Is that a life worth living? Or, as a better parallel, a healthy adult who suffered brain damage such that he or she could not advocate for themselves. Or some kind of neurological deterioration like ALS (sorry, circa-1961 Stephen Hawking, you have two years, at best, and that is just not worth treating you for).

What does this mean for the 850,000 British people who currently have Alzheimer’s? I would love for the Bureau of Life Quality Assessors to reconcile the decision to refuse care to Charlie Gard with their ongoing treatment of patients with late-stage Alzheimer’s. Surely, the dignified, humane thing to do is simply to refuse to treat them at all and allow for a quicker death. Nay, to block and pro-actively obstruct anyone’s attempts to treat them. We don’t want to be dragging out anyone’s un-worthwhile life, after all. We can also alleviate ourselves of the undue burden of signing living wills and healthcare proxies as well: after all, once a person can no longer make their own decisions, the Council on Lives Worth Living takes over.

Beyond the issues surrounding medical treatments for patients who cannot speak for themselves, this line of thinking has some other frightening logical outcomes that may currently seem far-fetched, but maybe aren’t as distant as you think. If the state owns your children and has the authority to overrule parents’ wishes in the pursuit of things it deems to be in the child’s interest, what do we do with kids who have special talents? Do extraordinary British children still have the right to pursue those activities that they enjoy regardless of what the state thinks is best? Can the state take gifted students and force them into specialized academies of science or math because, well, that’s what’s “in their best interest”? Do we start taking extraordinary athletes from their parents at a young age in order to send them to a special training facility to win eventual glory for the nation? If that sounds particularly Soviet, it is because that is probably where you've heard of that before. Once you have established that the state owns every child as its ultimate parent, you’ve allowed for that level of control over your life. It’s not a coincidence they called it “The Mother Land”.

Finally, how much do you trust the state to nurture and care for children deemed “different?” Maybe a child has fallen behind in school, or suffers from some kind of learning disability. Maybe he is just kinda weird and socially awkward. Maybe he is gay or transgender. Whatever the “problem” (as defined, of course, by the bureaucracy), the state now has the right to “fix”, or not, your children, through whatever means it determines is appropriate. Obviously, that usually isn’t going to result in killing the child, but Charlie Gard has taught us that sometimes, that’s what is in the child’s best interest…

I’m not trying to imply that the government of the UK is about to round up promising rowers to go to Henley Regatta Prep school or re-educating every four-year old boy who puts on a dress at day care. I get that the facts in the Charlie Gard case are particularly tragic and his diagnosis especially grave. But the theory put forth by the government, and affirmed by the courts, is extraordinarily far reaching and utterly terrifying. This isn’t a case of the state refusing costly or difficult medical care, this is about a state asserting its authority to do as it pleases with the children of its citizens, even if that means going to court to physically detain an infant against its parents’ wishes for the explicit purpose of denying the child legitimate medical care.

This case has raised emotions on both sides of the Atlantic, and Charlie’s death will answer none of the questions the case raises. Charlie’s parents are not only losing their only child, they are being tormented by a bureaucracy that seems to be intent on allowing their son to die as it sees fit mostly just to prove to everyone in the UK that it has the authority to do it. 

The British, along with much of the rest of Europe, have chosen to turn to the state to solve their problems. They have elected to surrender enormous swaths of freedom to government bureaucracy, and this is the inevitable outcome. May we be fortunate enough that our fellow Americans don’t make the same mistakes.


0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Misfits

    Just a gaggle of people from all over who have similar interests and loud opinions mixed with a dose of humor. We met on Twitter.
    ​Enough said.

    (If that's not enough, you can learn more here)

    Tweets by misfitspolitics

    Archives

    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    January 2021
    September 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016

    Categories

    All
    2016
    9/11
    Abortion
    AFB
    Afghanistan
    Air Force
    #alfieevans
    Alfie Evans
    ALS
    Armed Forces
    Army
    Baby
    Ben Carson
    Bernie
    Blog
    Bosnia
    CAOC
    #CelebrateWomen
    Christie
    City Council
    Comey
    Cooking
    Crete
    Cruz
    Deep Fry
    Desert Storm
    Donald Trump
    Drug Companies
    Election
    England
    Europe
    Exclusivity
    F-16
    Fanfic
    Fayetteville
    FBI
    FDA
    Fiction
    Fire
    Florida
    Free Market
    Fun
    Germany
    Gilmore
    Government
    Health Care
    Hillary Clinton
    Hobby
    Iraq
    Italy
    John Kasich
    Kevin Williamson
    Korea
    Kuwait
    LANTIRN
    Life
    Local Politics
    Marco Rubio
    Medical Care
    Memoir
    Military
    MIsfitMemo
    #MisfitMemo
    Misfits
    Misfits Politics
    Moms
    Mother's Day
    Narrative
    National Review
    NATO
    Navy
    #NeverTrump
    Patent
    Pharmaceutical
    Philippines
    Phillippines
    Politics
    Raymond
    Reform
    Rex
    Rubio
    Scarcity
    September 11th
    Service
    Ted Cruz
    Thread
    Tweetstorm
    Twitter
    UK
    Water
    Weekly Rewind
    World Cup
    World Trade Center

    RSS Feed

Home

About

Contact​

Copyright © 2016
  MisfitsPolitics
  • Home
  • Misfit Migrants
  • Mess Hall
  • Meet The Misfits
  • Misc. Musings
  • Home
  • Misfit Migrants
  • Mess Hall
  • Meet The Misfits
  • Misc. Musings