misfitS pOLITICS

We talk. We write. We entertain. Or so we think.
  • Home
  • Misfit Migrants
  • Mess Hall
  • Meet The Misfits
  • Misc. Musings
  • Home
  • Misfit Migrants
  • Mess Hall
  • Meet The Misfits
  • Misc. Musings

Gorsuch Refuses to Dance the Chevron Two-Step

2/2/2017

4 Comments

 
Mo
When Trump promised last summer to nominate originalists to the Supreme Court, I didn’t believe him. I don’t think I was alone in my skepticism. Trump is not well-known for truth-telling or promise-keeping. Tuesday, though, he proved me wrong by nominating Neil Gorsuch, currently a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit. Of course, it’s possible Gorsuch will turn out to be another Justice Souter, so I don’t want to go overboard. But based on his jurisprudence, it seems unlikely.

What gives me the most hope is Gorsuch’s take on Chevron deference—a Supreme Court doctrine that is, frankly, an affront to the separation of powers. Chevron is a famous Supreme Court case about executive agencies like the EPA. Here’s how it works: Agencies are empowered by statutes passed by Congress and signed by the President. So, for example, the EPA is empowered by the Clean Air Act, among other statutes. These statutes are supposed to dictate what powers the agency has to regulate. The agency empowered under a statute then makes regulations that flesh out the details of the statute.  

In practice, these regulations invade way too many aspects of life. The Obama administration alone passed 21,000 regulations during his tenure—21,000!  Major corporations have entire departments devoted to compliance with the regulations governing their industries. Even though they have not been passed by Congress or signed by the President, these regulations have the force of law. And the punishment for violations can be severe.

As you’d expect, disputes often arise over whether agencies have exceeded the powers granted to them under the governing statute. Chevron deference is a doctrine the Supreme Court developed to deal with these disputes. Under Chevron, the court first asks whether the statute is ambiguous on the specific issue. If the statute is ambiguous, the court will defer to the agency’s interpretation as long as it’s “reasonable.” Here’s the thing: these statutes are almost always ambiguous, and courts almost always defer to the agency’s interpretation. What this means is executive agencies wield extraordinary power, shielded from accountability by the electorate and inviting the most pernicious crony capitalism. What’s worse, Congress is happy to delegate its legislative responsibilities to the executive to avoid responsibility, and the President is happy to assume that power.

​What’s so great about Gorsuch is he doesn’t seem to like this arrangement, at all. In 2014, he wrote a concurring opinion in an immigration case, Gutierrez-Brizuela v. Lynch, in which he laid out, in expansive, compelling fashion, why Chevron must go. It’s an amazing piece of writing, and exceedingly rare to find in court opinions. His opening paragraph is a wonder:

There’s an elephant in the room with us today. We have studiously attempted to work our way around it and even left it unremarked. But the fact is
Chevron and Brand X permit executive bureaucracies to swallow huge amounts of core judicial and legislative power and concentrate federal power in a way that seems more than a little difficult to square with the Constitution of the framers’ design. Maybe the time has come to face the behemoth.

​
Gorsuch goes on to lay out, in detail, why Chevron violates separation of powers, specifically, in his view, because the judiciary almost completely abdicates its responsibility to interpret statutes and delegates that power to the agencies. So, both Congress and the courts delegate most of their authority—legislation in the case of Congress and statutory interpretation in the case of the judiciary—to the executive branch. As an added bonus, Gorsuch even cites The Federalist Papers! Multiple times! If you have the time, I urge you to read his concurrence in full.

Democrats are all worked up about this concurrence because they love the
Chevron doctrine and they fear what Gorsuch will do to it. Agencies are a favorite of Democrats. They are a shining beacon of progressivism—rule by experts. Of course, Democrats always think they’ll be back in the White House soon enough, and to them, the ratchet of power always goes only one way, to the Left. What they’re missing, though, is that getting rid of Chevron would remove power from an executive branch that is currently headed by Trump, the next coming of Hitler to them. They should welcome this development and, as with everything else they’re confronting now with Trump in office, embrace Constitutional principles like separation of powers. They won’t.
4 Comments
Ilan
2/2/2017 12:35:25 pm

Thanks for the clear explanation!

Reply
Charles
2/2/2017 01:26:33 pm

The left fears restoring order to the three branches the most hence their hysteria otherwise they can not implement their agenda.

Reply
Herr Morgenholz
2/4/2017 06:46:57 pm

Chevron was a way to not hear cases, and it was the laziest and most destructive way to keep those cases off the docket.

Because judges are just as bad as any other government employee.

Reply
43north
8/18/2017 06:49:01 pm

Mo wrote: "Of course, Democrats always think they’ll be back in the White House soon enough, and to them, the ratchet of power always goes only one way, to the Left"

Quite true. Of course, those years without a (D) majority in both House and Senate and a (D) in 1600 are/should be/will soon be a legacy of our racist/misogynist past.

The adoration of unfettered power is so enjoyed by the left, they're often blind to the consequences of both a change in regime (as you stated) or to political sausage-making.

A Progressive goal would be to remove the military-styled "Assault Weapons" from the 'regressive Right' - a/k/a Three Percenters, Militia, rednecks/MAGA voters.
Stated goal: Prevention of school/movie theater/workplace violence.
Actual goal: FUCK YOU REDNECK SCUM.

Sadly (for some) "flyover states" vote.
Often christian, evangelical, gun-toting, bible-clinging, white redneck states.
Whut do they hate more than gun laws?
Abortion, and "choice" services offered by progressive organizations such as Planned Parenthood.

Get enough Republicans who want an end to abortion and birth control services - and enough Democrats who want to score big with the anti-gun base?
You have a no-gun, no-abortion law passed, enforced by "enabling legislation".

DEA, requires no narcotics be used in abortion services.
Same for "morning-after pills".
BATFE, requires all firearms classified as "AWB" be turned in.

Proponents? Republicans and Democrats who view Government as supra to the person, the citizen.
Opponents? Randy Weaver the first dozen on either side, and there will be no opposition.

Full weight. On TV.
Ok, so who opposes our new rules?

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Misfits

    Just a gaggle of people from all over who have similar interests and loud opinions mixed with a dose of humor. We met on Twitter.
    ​Enough said.

    (If that's not enough, you can learn more here)

    Tweets by misfitspolitics

    Archives

    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    January 2021
    September 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016

    Categories

    All
    2016
    9/11
    Abortion
    AFB
    Afghanistan
    Air Force
    #alfieevans
    Alfie Evans
    ALS
    Armed Forces
    Army
    Baby
    Ben Carson
    Bernie
    Blog
    Bosnia
    CAOC
    #CelebrateWomen
    Christie
    City Council
    Comey
    Cooking
    Crete
    Cruz
    Deep Fry
    Desert Storm
    Donald Trump
    Drug Companies
    Election
    England
    Europe
    Exclusivity
    F-16
    Fanfic
    Fayetteville
    FBI
    FDA
    Fiction
    Fire
    Florida
    Free Market
    Fun
    Germany
    Gilmore
    Government
    Health Care
    Hillary Clinton
    Hobby
    Iraq
    Italy
    John Kasich
    Kevin Williamson
    Korea
    Kuwait
    LANTIRN
    Life
    Local Politics
    Marco Rubio
    Medical Care
    Memoir
    Military
    MIsfitMemo
    #MisfitMemo
    Misfits
    Misfits Politics
    Moms
    Mother's Day
    Narrative
    National Review
    NATO
    Navy
    #NeverTrump
    Patent
    Pharmaceutical
    Philippines
    Phillippines
    Politics
    Raymond
    Reform
    Rex
    Rubio
    Scarcity
    September 11th
    Service
    Ted Cruz
    Thread
    Tweetstorm
    Twitter
    UK
    Water
    Weekly Rewind
    World Cup
    World Trade Center

    RSS Feed

Home

About

Contact​

Copyright © 2016
  MisfitsPolitics
  • Home
  • Misfit Migrants
  • Mess Hall
  • Meet The Misfits
  • Misc. Musings
  • Home
  • Misfit Migrants
  • Mess Hall
  • Meet The Misfits
  • Misc. Musings